Trump’s hush money case should be paused, prosecutors say

Trump’s hush money case should be paused, prosecutors say
The case in which Donald Trump was convicted on criminal charges stemming from hush money paid to a porn star should be paused in light of his election victory to allow Trump to seek dismissal, New York prosecutors said on Tuesday. (AP/File)
Short Url
Updated 19 November 2024
Follow

Trump’s hush money case should be paused, prosecutors say

Trump’s hush money case should be paused, prosecutors say
  • The prosecutors had asked for more time to consider next steps in the case
  • Trump pleaded not guilty in the case, which he has long portrayed as a politically motivated attempt by Bragg, a Democrat, to interfere with his campaign

NEW YORK: The case in which Donald Trump was convicted on criminal charges stemming from hush money paid to a porn star should be paused in light of his election victory to allow Trump to seek dismissal, New York prosecutors said on Tuesday.
Trump, 78, is hoping to enter office for a second term unencumbered by any of the four criminal cases he has faced and which some said would derail his 2024 candidacy to return to the White House.
The Republican Trump was convicted in May of falsifying business records to cover up a $130,000 payment his former lawyer Michael Cohen made to porn star Stormy Daniels for her silence before the 2016 election about a sexual encounter she says she had with Trump, who denies it.
The case marked the first time a US president — former or sitting — had been convicted of or charged with a criminal offense.
Trump had been scheduled to be sentenced on Nov. 26, but Merchan last week put all proceedings in the case on pause at the request of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s office.
The prosecutors had asked for more time to consider next steps in the case, citing the need to balance the “competing interests” between having the criminal case go forward and protecting the office of the president.
Trump pleaded not guilty in the case, which he has long portrayed as a politically motivated attempt by Bragg, a Democrat, to interfere with his campaign.
His defense lawyers urged Merchan to dismiss the case, arguing that having it loom over him while he was president would cause “unconstitutional impediments” to his ability to govern.
Trump’s lawyers also argued his conviction should be vacated and the charges dismissed because of the US Supreme Court’s ruling in July that presidents cannot be prosecuted over their official acts, and that evidence of their official acts cannot be used in trials over personal behavior.
Bragg’s office said that its case dealt with purely personal conduct.
Falsification of business records is punishable by up to four years in prison. Before he was elected, experts said it was unlikely — but not impossible — that Trump would face time behind bars, with punishments such as a fine or probation seen as more likely.
Trump’s victory over Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris in the Nov. 5 election made the prospect of imposing a sentence of jail or probation even more politically fraught and impractical, given that a sentence could have impeded his ability to conduct the duties of the presidency.
Trump was indicted on three separate slates of state and federal charges in 2023, one involving classified documents he kept after leaving office and two others involving his efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss.
A Florida-based federal judge in July dismissed the documents case. The Justice Department is now evaluating how to wind down the federal election-related case. Trump also faces state criminal charges in Georgia over his bid to reverse his 2020 loss in that state, but the case remains in limbo.


Saudi Arabia, India agree to strengthen critical minerals partnership 

Saudi Arabia, India agree to strengthen critical minerals partnership 
Updated 24 sec ago
Follow

Saudi Arabia, India agree to strengthen critical minerals partnership 

Saudi Arabia, India agree to strengthen critical minerals partnership 
  • Under new National Critical Minerals Mission, India plans to secure overseas mining assets
  • Value of Saudi Arabia’s untapped mineral resources is estimated at $2.5 trillion  

NEW DELHI: Saudi Arabia and India agreed on Tuesday to strengthen cooperation in the critical minerals sector, as New Delhi seeks to accelerate its green energy transition. 

Critical minerals, such as lithium, copper and rare earth, are essential raw materials required for clean energy technologies, used in wind turbines, electric vehicles, battery manufacturing and to help develop artificial intelligence systems.  

India’s coal and mines minister G. Kishan Reddy and his Saudi counterpart, Bandar Al-Khorayef, met in the Indian capital and discussed “fostering resilient supply chains, investments in mineral value addition, and technological collaboration,” India’s Ministry of Mines said in a statement. 

“India and Saudi Arabia are deepening cooperation in the critical minerals sector,” the ministry said. 

“The dialogue aligns with India’s National Critical Minerals Mission, focusing on securing resources essential for clean energy and high-tech industries.” 

The Indian government launched just last week the National Critical Mineral Mission, a comprehensive plan aimed at securing the country’s national, energy and food security needs.  

Under the mission, India plans to secure overseas mining assets, while also expanding its domestic exploration of critical mineral blocks, increase research and development projects, and create 10,000 skilled professionals specializing in the sector. 

These efforts are also aimed at supporting India’s target of cutting its emissions to net zero by 2070. 

During their meeting on Tuesday, Reddy and Al-Khorayef “explored strengthening mineral supply chains, investment opportunities and knowledge-sharing in mineral exploration,” the Indian mines ministry said. 

Saudi Arabia, which estimates the value of its untapped mineral resources at $2.5 trillion, is aiming to become a global hub for critical minerals trade, with the sector being key to the Kingdom’s Vision 2030 diversification and transformation plan. 

In 2022, Riyadh started awarding mining exploration licenses to international investors. 

“Critical minerals, along with AI, and similar future commodities will be the new proverbial oil,” Kabir Taneja, deputy director at the Observer Research Foundation, told Arab News. 

While commodities are traditionally a game of individual state interests and policies rather than a product of multilateralism, “states like India (and) Saudi Arabia should join hands in pursuing these futures as part of a common narrative, that is of multipolarity,” he said. 

Cooperation in the critical minerals sector is likely to benefit both India and Saudi Arabia, said Muddassir Qamar, associate professor at the Center for West Asian Studies at Jawaharlal Nehru University.

“India’s plan for augmenting its manufacturing sector and competing with major manufacturing hubs in Asia and globally would require import of critical minerals, which Saudi Arabia has,” he told Arab News. 

“If this can evolve into more than just transactional relations, it’s a win-win for both countries.”


Saudi Arabia, India agree to strengthen critical minerals partnership

Saudi Arabia, India agree to strengthen critical minerals partnership
Updated 2 min 41 sec ago
Follow

Saudi Arabia, India agree to strengthen critical minerals partnership

Saudi Arabia, India agree to strengthen critical minerals partnership
  • Under new National Critical Minerals Mission, India plans to secure overseas mining assets
  • Value of Saudi Arabia’s untapped mineral resources is estimated at $2.5 trillion

NEW DELHI: Saudi Arabia and India agreed on Tuesday to strengthen cooperation in the critical minerals sector, as New Delhi seeks to accelerate its green energy transition.
Critical minerals, such as lithium, copper and rare earth, are essential raw materials required for clean energy technologies, used in wind turbines, electric vehicles, battery manufacturing and to help develop artificial intelligence systems.
India’s coal and mines minister G. Kishan Reddy and his Saudi counterpart, Bandar Al-Khorayef, met in the Indian capital and discussed “fostering resilient supply chains, investments in mineral value addition, and technological collaboration,” India’s Ministry of Mines said in a statement.
“India and Saudi Arabia are deepening cooperation in the critical minerals sector,” the ministry said.
“The dialogue aligns with India’s National Critical Minerals Mission, focusing on securing resources essential for clean energy and high-tech industries.”
The Indian government launched just last week the National Critical Mineral Mission, a comprehensive plan aimed at securing the country’s national, energy and food security needs.
Under the mission, India plans to secure overseas mining assets, while also expanding its domestic exploration of critical mineral blocks, increase research and development projects, and create 10,000 skilled professionals specializing in the sector.
These efforts are also aimed toward supporting India’s target of cutting its emissions to net zero by 2070.
During their meeting on Tuesday, Reddy and Al-Khorayef “explored strengthening mineral supply chains, investment opportunities and knowledge-sharing in mineral exploration,” the Indian mines ministry said.
Saudi Arabia, which estimates the value of its untapped mineral resources at $2.5 trillion, is aiming to become a global hub for critical minerals trade, with the sector being key to the Kingdom’s Vision 2030 diversification and transformation plan. 
In 2022, Riyadh started awarding mining exploration licenses to international investors. 
“Critical minerals, along with AI, and similar future commodities will be the new proverbial oil,” Kabir Taneja, deputy director at the Observer Research Foundation, told Arab News.
While commodities are traditionally a game of individual state interests and policies rather than a product of multilateralism, “states like India (and) Saudi Arabia should join hands in pursuing these futures as part of a common narrative, that is of multipolarity,” he said. 
Cooperation in the critical minerals sector is likely to benefit both India and Saudi Arabia, said Muddassir Qamar, associate professor at the Center for West Asian Studies in Jawaharlal Nehru University.
“India’s plan for augmenting its manufacturing sector and compete with major manufacturing hubs in Asia and globally would require import of critical minerals, which Saudi Arabia has,” he told Arab News. 
“If this can evolve into more than just transactional relations, it’s a win-win for both countries.”


5 shot at adult education center in Sweden

5 shot at adult education center in Sweden
Updated 8 min 27 sec ago
Follow

5 shot at adult education center in Sweden

5 shot at adult education center in Sweden
  • “The reports of violence in Orebro are very serious,” Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer said

OREBRO, Sweden: Police said Tuesday that five people were shot at an adult education center in Sweden.
The extent of their injuries wasn’t immediately clear.
The adult education center is about 200 kilometers (125 miles) west of Stockholm.
“The reports of violence in Orebro are very serious. The police are on site and the operation is in full swing. The government is in close contact with the police, and is closely following developments,” Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer told Swedish news agency TT.


UK to set up council for Islamophobia definition

UK to set up council for Islamophobia definition
Updated 04 February 2025
Follow

UK to set up council for Islamophobia definition

UK to set up council for Islamophobia definition
  • Deputy PM to establish body to advise government on areas relating to anti-Muslim hate
  • Conservative ex-minister tipped to head council after working on previous definition

LONDON: The UK is planning to establish a council to offer advice to the government and discuss matters relating to Islamophobia.

The council, to be set up by Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner, will have 16 members. Among its duties will be helping provide a new official definition of Islamophobia in the UK.

Former Conservative Minister Dominic Grieve is thought to have been recommended to lead the council, having previously chaired the Citizens’ UK Commission on Islam.

Qari Asim, a Leeds-based imam who previously worked as an advisor to the government, has also been shortlisted to join the council.

Grieve wrote a forward to a 2018 all-party parliamentary group report which established an Islamophobia definition subsequently adopted by the Labour Party.

The all-party Islamophobia report determined that “Islamophobia is rooted in racism and is a type of racism that targets expressions of Muslimness or perceived Muslimness.”

Grieve said he “greatly welcomed” the report in his forward, adding that it “makes an important contribution to the debate as to how Islamophobia can best be addressed. It is well researched and can give all of us food both for thought and positive action.”

He told the Daily Telegraph that he had not yet been approached to lead the new council, but added: “If I can be of assistance in doing something constructive requested by any government on a non-party political basis I am willing to consider it. It depends on what it is and whether I can add value and help the wider public service.”

On the report’s definition of Islamophobia, he said: “It was apparent at the time that defining Islamophobia is extremely difficult for perfectly valid reasons relating to freedom of expression.”

Grieve added: “Perfectly law-abiding Muslims going about their business and well integrated into society are suffering discrimination and abuse.”

The Daily Telegraph reported that Rayner is looking to establish a similar council on antisemitism, alongside plans to widen reporting of anti-Muslim and anti-Jewish non-crime hate incidents in the UK.

A spokesman for Rayner’s department told the newspaper: “All forms of religious and racial hatred have absolutely no place in our society. The Government engages regularly with faith communities to help foster strong working relationships and we are actively exploring a more integrated and cohesive approach to tackling racial and religious hatred, including Islamophobia and anti-Semitism. Further details of this work will be set out shortly.”


South Korea’s Yoon in court again for impeachment hearings

South Korea’s Yoon in court again for impeachment hearings
Updated 04 February 2025
Follow

South Korea’s Yoon in court again for impeachment hearings

South Korea’s Yoon in court again for impeachment hearings
  • The former prosecutor plunged democratic South Korea into political turmoil when he declared martial law on December 3
  • His attempt to impose martial law only lasted around six hours as the opposition-led parliament defied troops to vote it down

SEOUL: South Korea’s impeached President Yoon Suk Yeol, who has been arrested and suspended from duties over his declaration of martial law, was in court again Tuesday for hearings that will decide whether to officially remove him from office.
The former prosecutor plunged democratic South Korea into political turmoil when he declared martial law on December 3, suspending civilian rule and sending soldiers to parliament.
His attempt to impose martial law only lasted around six hours as the opposition-led parliament defied troops to vote it down, and later impeached him over the move.
As part of a separate criminal probe, Yoon was detained in mid-January on insurrection charges, becoming the first sitting South Korean head of state to be arrested.
He is being held in detention but has been attending hearings at the Constitutional Court, which will determine whether his impeachment is upheld.
If the court upholds the impeachment, an election must be held within 60 days to elect a new president.
Yoon suggested at the hearing that even if he had ordered the arrest of MPs to prevent them from voting down his decree, it would not legally matter because it had not been carried out.
“Debating whether I had given the (arrest) order or not when nothing had happened felt like chasing the shadow of the moon on the river,” he said.
At previous hearings, Yoon denied instructing top military commanders to “drag out” lawmakers from parliament, a claim refuted by opposition MPs.
He has argued that he did not believe the short-lived martial law was a “failed martial law,” but rather one that “ended a bit sooner” than he expected.
During Tuesday’s hearing, two former military commanders and an ex-spy agency official testified as witnesses.
Hong Jang-won, a former deputy director of the National Intelligence Service, testified before lawmakers earlier that he had been ordered to arrest politicians — a claim that contradicts Yoon’s denial of such an order.
Yoon, 64, was indicted in January, with prosecutors accusing him of being a “ringleader of the insurrection.”
He faces a separate criminal trial on those charges. Insurrection is not covered by presidential immunity.
If convicted, he faces jail time or the death penalty.
Yoon’s lawyers on Tuesday filed a motion to a court to cancel his detention, they told AFP, saying they had made the move “in consideration of illegality of probe” into his alleged crime.
The Seoul Central District Court, which is handling Yoon’s case, is expected to review the motion in coming days.
Yoon has been in detention since his January 15 arrest.