US aid cut will deepen Rohingya crisis

Short Url

In a world increasingly defined by humanitarian crises, the US has long been a beacon of hope for those suffering from violence, displacement, and poverty. Yet, the new administration’s recent decision to slash US aid to Myanmar and Bangladesh represents a stark departure from this legacy, with devastating consequences for millions of vulnerable people — particularly the Rohingya, a persecuted minority group that has endured unspeakable atrocities. The decision is not only morally indefensible but also strategically shortsighted, undermining US leadership on the global stage and exacerbating one of the most urgent humanitarian crises of our time.
The Rohingya, a predominantly Muslim ethnic group from Myanmar’s Rakhine State, have faced decades of systemic discrimination and violence. In 2017, the Myanmar military launched a brutal campaign of ethnic cleansing, killing thousands, razing villages, and forcing more than 740,000 Rohingya to flee to neighboring Bangladesh. The UN has described the military’s actions as a “textbook example of ethnic cleansing,” and human rights organizations have documented widespread atrocities, including mass killings, sexual violence, and the deliberate destruction of communities. For those who survived, the refugee camps in Bangladesh’s Cox’s Bazar district became a precarious sanctuary, overcrowded and under-resourced, but a lifeline nonetheless.
US aid has played a critical role in addressing this crisis. Over the years, American assistance has provided food, clean water, healthcare, and shelter to Rohingya refugees, as well as support for the host communities in Bangladesh that have generously taken them in. This aid has not only saved lives but also helped stabilize a volatile region, preventing the crisis from spiraling further out of control. By cutting this funding, the US administration is effectively abandoning the Rohingya at their most vulnerable moment, leaving them to face hunger, disease, and despair without the support they desperately need.
The impact of this decision will be felt far beyond the refugee camps. In Bangladesh, which already struggles with poverty and overpopulation, the withdrawal of US aid will place an unbearable strain on local resources. The country has shown remarkable resilience and compassion in hosting nearly a million refugees, but it cannot do so indefinitely without international support. Without adequate funding, the already dire conditions in the camps will worsen, increasing the risk of disease outbreaks, malnutrition, and social unrest. This, in turn, could destabilize the region, creating a breeding ground for extremism and further displacement.

The world cannot afford to turn its back on those in need, no matter how far away they are. 

Dr. Azeem Ibrahim

In Myanmar, the cuts to US aid will undermine efforts to address the root causes of the Rohingya crisis. While the Myanmar government has shown little willingness to hold the military accountable for its crimes or to grant the Rohingya citizenship and basic rights, US aid has been instrumental in supporting civil society organizations, promoting human rights, and fostering dialogue between communities. By withdrawing this support, the US administration is sending a dangerous message to Myanmar’s leaders that the US is no longer committed to holding them accountable for their actions. This could embolden the military to continue its campaign of repression against the Rohingya and other ethnic minorities, perpetuating the cycle of violence and displacement.
The decision to cut aid is particularly perplexing given the broader geopolitical context. China, which has long sought to expand its influence in Southeast Asia, has been quick to fill the void left by the US. Beijing has provided economic and military support to Myanmar, shielding its government from international criticism and undermining efforts to hold the military accountable for its crimes. By withdrawing aid, the US is ceding ground to China, weakening its own position in the region and undermining its ability to promote democracy, human rights, and the rule of law.
Moreover, the cuts to US aid are at odds with the values that America claims to represent. The US has long been a champion of human rights and a leader in responding to humanitarian crises around the world. By turning its back on the Rohingya, the US administration is betraying this legacy and sending a message that the US is no longer willing to stand up for the most vulnerable. This not only tarnishes America’s reputation but also undermines its moral authority to advocate for human rights and democracy elsewhere.
The consequences of this decision will be felt for years to come. Without adequate support, the Rohingya will continue to languish in refugee camps, denied their basic rights, and unable to return to their homes. The conditions in the camps will deteriorate, increasing the risk of disease, malnutrition, and social unrest. The region will become more unstable, creating new challenges for the international community. The US will lose its standing as a global leader, ceding ground to authoritarian regimes, and undermining its own long-term interests.
There is still time to reverse this decision. The US must reaffirm its commitment to the Rohingya and to the principles of human rights and humanitarian assistance. This means restoring aid to Myanmar and Bangladesh, increasing support for refugee programs, and working with the international community to hold the Myanmar military accountable for its crimes. It also means addressing the root causes of the crisis, including the systemic discrimination and violence that have forced the Rohingya to flee their homes.
The Rohingya crisis is a test of humanity. It is a reminder that the world cannot afford to turn its back on those in need, no matter how far away they are. By cutting aid to Myanmar and Bangladesh, the US administration is failing this test, with devastating consequences for millions of people. The US must do better.

  • Dr. Azeem Ibrahim is the director of special initiatives at the Newlines Institute for Strategy and Policy in Washington, DC. X: @AzeemIbrahim