UK says Australia ‘considering’ joining group to protect Ukraine peace

UK says Australia ‘considering’ joining group to protect Ukraine peace
People protest against President Donald Trump’s policy concerning Ukraine in front of the US Embassy in Kyiv, Mar. 8, 2025. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 32 sec ago
Follow

UK says Australia ‘considering’ joining group to protect Ukraine peace

UK says Australia ‘considering’ joining group to protect Ukraine peace
  • European countries have been rushing to boost support for Ukraine
  • Several European states have said they would be willing to deploy troops to Ukraine as a “security guarantee“

LONDON: The UK on Saturday said that Australia’s Prime Minister Anthony Albanese was considering joining a group of countries prepared to protect an eventual ceasefire in the Russia-Ukraine war.
Britain and France have been leading efforts to form the so-called “coalition of the willing,” with the United States’ long-term commitment to Europe’s security now in doubt under President Donald Trump.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer “spoke to the Prime Minister of Australia Anthony Albanese this morning,” the UK leader’s office said on Saturday.
“He welcomed Prime Minister Albanese’s commitment to consider contributing to a Coalition of the Willing for Ukraine and looked forward to the Chiefs of Defense meeting in Paris on Tuesday.”
European countries have been rushing to boost support for Ukraine as Trump pursues direct talks with Russian leader Vladimir Putin to end Moscow’s three-year-long invasion of Ukraine.
Several European states have said they would be willing to deploy troops to Ukraine as a “security guarantee.”
Key details about the “coalition of the willing” have not been specified, but the grouping was mentioned by Starmer during a summit of European leaders in London last Sunday aimed at guaranteeing “lasting peace” in Ukraine.
British officials have held talks with around 20 countries interested in being part of the group, a UK official said on Thursday.
The official refused to name the nations but said they were “largely European and Commonwealth partners.”
Earlier this week, Albanese told journalists that Australia was “ready to assist” Ukraine.
“There’s discussion at the moment about potential peacekeeping,” he said. “From my government’s perspective, we’re open to consideration of any proposals going forward.”


Trump’s Scottish golf resort vandalized with pro-Palestine graffiti

Updated 5 sec ago
Follow

Trump’s Scottish golf resort vandalized with pro-Palestine graffiti

Trump’s Scottish golf resort vandalized with pro-Palestine graffiti
Local media on Saturday showed images of red paint scrawled across walls at the course with the slogans “Free Gaza” and “Free Palestine“
“Gaza is not for sale” was also painted on one of the greens and holes dug up on the course

LONDON: US President Donald Trump’s Turnberry golf resort in Scotland has been daubed with pro-Palestinian graffiti, with a protest group claiming responsibility.
Local media on Saturday showed images of red paint scrawled across walls at the course with the slogans “Free Gaza” and “Free Palestine” as well as insults against Trump.
“Gaza is not for sale” was also painted on one of the greens and holes dug up on the course.
Palestine Action said it caused the damage, posting on social media platform X: “Whilst Trump attempts to treat Gaza as his property, he should know his own property is within reach.”
Last month, Trump enraged the Arab world by declaring unexpectedly that the United States would take over Gaza, resettle its over 2-million Palestinian population and develop it into the “Riviera of the Middle East.”
Police Scotland said it was investigating.
“Around 4.40am on Saturday, 8 March, 2025, we received a report of damage to the golf course and a premises on Maidens Road, Turnberry,” a Police Scotland spokesperson said, adding that enquiries were ongoing.
Separately on Saturday, a man waving a Palestinian flag climbed the Big Ben tower at London’s Palace of Westminster.


Screenshot taken from a video showing “Gaza is not for sale” painted on one of the greens and holes dug up at US President Donald Trump’s Turnberry golf resort in Scotland that has been daubed with pro-Palestinian graffiti, with a protest group claiming responsibility. (X/@krassenstein)

US cancels $400m in grants, contracts to Columbia University over antisemitism allegations

US cancels $400m in grants, contracts to Columbia University over antisemitism allegations
Updated 9 min 4 sec ago
Follow

US cancels $400m in grants, contracts to Columbia University over antisemitism allegations

US cancels $400m in grants, contracts to Columbia University over antisemitism allegations
  • Announcement was made in a joint statement by the departments of Justice, Education and Health and Human Services as well as the General Services Administration
  • Columbia has been at the forefront of a pro-Palestinian and anti-Israel student protest movement

NEW YORK: US President Donald Trump’s administration said it had canceled grants and contracts worth about $400 million to Columbia University because of what it described as antisemitic harassment on and near the school’s New York City campus.
Friday’s announcement was made in a joint statement by the departments of Justice, Education and Health and Human Services as well as the General Services Administration.
The Trump administration declined to specify the grants and contracts affected or its evidence of antisemitic harassment.
The announced cuts would come out of what the administration said was more than $5 billion in grants presently committed to Columbia. Much of the funding goes to health care and scientific research but Reuters could not verify the figures.
The announcement of “immediate” cuts was likely to face legal challenges, with civil rights groups saying the contract cancelations lacked due process and were an unconstitutional punishment for protected speech.
Columbia has been at the forefront of a pro-Palestinian and anti-Israel student protest movement that swept across campuses over the last year as Israel’s war in Gaza has raged.
The university has said it has worked to combat antisemitism and other prejudice on its campus while fending off accusations from civil rights groups that it is letting the government erode academia’s free speech protections.
Columbia protesters, some of whom seized control of an academic building for a few hours in April and set up tent encampments on campus lawns, have demanded the school stop investing in companies that support Israel’s military occupation of Palestinian territories.
There have been allegations of antisemitism, Islamophobia and racism in protests and pro-Israel counter-protests.
Columbia University Apartheid Divest, a coalition of student groups behind the pro-Palestinian protests, includes Jewish students and groups among its organizers. They say that criticism of Israel is being wrongly conflated with antisemitism. Some Jewish and Israeli students have said the protests are intimidating and disruptive.
“Cancelling these taxpayer funds is our strongest signal yet that the Federal Government is not going to be party to an educational institution like Columbia that does not protect Jewish students and staff,” Leo Terrell, who leads the Justice Department’s antisemitism task force, said in the statement.
Wyn Hornbuckle, a Justice Department spokesperson, declined to specify the grants and contracts that were cut. Hornbuckle also declined to describe the government’s evidence of antisemitism at Columbia. Spokespeople for the other three departments did not respond to questions.

CRITICS SAY CUTS PUNISH POLITICAL SPEECH
The university has disciplined dozens of pro-Palestinian students and staff over the last year, in many cases issuing suspensions, and twice called in police to have pro-Palestinian protesters arrested, which was widely criticized by faculty.
Samantha Slater, a Columbia spokesperson, said school staff “pledge to work with the federal government to restore Columbia’s federal funding.”
“We take Columbia’s legal obligations seriously and understand how serious this announcement is and are committed to combating antisemitism and ensuring the safety and wellbeing of our students, faculty, and staff,” her statement said.
Slater did not say if the school was told which grants and contracts had been affected.
The Civil Rights Act’s Title VI allows the government to investigate schools that receive federal funding if they are accused of discriminating against people on the basis of religion or national origin, among other protected classes.
The New York Civil Liberties Union said Friday’s announcement of immediate cuts was misusing the law to punish political speech.
“It is unconstitutional and unprecedented, but it is entirely consistent with Trump’s long-held desire to silence views with which he disagrees and clamp down on protest,” NYCLU Executive Director Donna Lieberman said in a statement.
“Protected political speech should not be a basis of punishment, and Title VI must be applied consistently with the First Amendment.”
US Jewish organizations had mixed responses to the announcement.
Brian Cohen, executive director of the pro-Israel student organization Hillel at Columbia, said in a statement he hoped the announcement would be a “wake-up call to Columbia’s administration and trustees.”
J Street, a Washington-based pro-Israel advocacy group, said there were unacceptable levels of antisemitism at Columbia but that Friday’s announcement undercut efforts to fix this.
“This decision is part of the Administration’s broader attack on academic institutions, and may cause these same institutions to overcorrect – stifling free speech for fear of having all of their funding cut,” Erin Beiner, director of the group’s student wing J Street U, said in a statement.


In his own words: Pope Francis’ views on resigning changed over time

In his own words: Pope Francis’ views on resigning changed over time
Updated 17 min 45 sec ago
Follow

In his own words: Pope Francis’ views on resigning changed over time

In his own words: Pope Francis’ views on resigning changed over time
  • On Saturday, the Vatican secretary of state, Cardinal Pietro Parolin, took Francis’ place to celebrate Mass for a pro-life group
  • On Sunday, another Vatican official, Cardinal Michael Czerny, is stepping in for the pope to celebrate a Holy Year Mass for volunteers

ROME: Pope Francis entered his fourth week in the hospital with double pneumonia, increasingly handing off his day-to-day duties to cardinals as questions swirl about the near and long-term future of his papacy.
On Saturday, the Vatican secretary of state, Cardinal Pietro Parolin, took Francis’ place to celebrate Mass for a pro-life group. On Sunday, another Vatican official, Cardinal Michael Czerny, is stepping in for the pope to celebrate a Holy Year Mass for volunteers.
There is no reason why such delegation of papal obligations cannot continue, especially since Francis remains conscious and working from the hospital. But the 88-year-old pope has spoken about the possibility of resignation, though his position has changed over time, especially after the death of Pope Benedict XVI.
Here’s what Francis has said about pope’s retiring, in his own words:
On Benedict’s resignation:
In his 2024 memoir, Life, Francis recounted how he first learned about Benedict’s resignation, the first in 600 years. He said a Vatican journalist had called him in Buenos Aires on Feb. 11, 2013, and told him the news as it was breaking.
“For a moment I was paralyzed. I could hardly believe what I was hearing,” Francis wrote in Life. “This was news I had never expected to receive in my lifetime: the resignation of a pope was unimaginable, although it was provided for in canon law. In the first few moments I said to myself, ‘I must have misunderstood, it’s not possible.’ But then I understood that Benedict had surely meditated and prayed for a long time before making this brave and historic decision. Faced with his declining strength, he had evidently realized that the only irreplaceable element in the Church is the Holy Spirit, and the only Lord is Jesus Christ. This is why he was a great pope, humble and sincere, who loved the church until the end.”
During the 10 years they lived together in the Vatican as a reigning and retired pope, Francis repeatedly praised Benedict’s courage and humility for resigning and said he had “opened the door” to future popes also stepping down.
On the chance he might follow:
In a 2022 interview with Spain’s ABC daily, Francis revealed that he had written a letter of resignation soon after he was elected pontiff. The letter laid out his resignation if medical problems impeded him from carrying out his duties or from freely announcing a resignation.
The text of the letter has not been released and it’s not known what sort of medical impairment or lack of consciousness might trigger a resignation. Canon law has no provision for what to do if a pope is permanently impaired and canonists are divided on whether a pre-written letter of resignation would be valid.
Canon 332.2 says that for a pope to resign his office, “it is required for validity that the resignation is made freely and properly manifested but not that it is accepted by anyone.”
Francis has repeated the existence of his resignation letter as recently as last year. But in Life, which was published a year ago this month, Francis said he had no plans to resign and was at least at that time enjoying good health.
“But this is, I repeat, a distant possibility, because I truly do not have any cause serious enough to make me think of resigning,” he said. “Some people may have hoped that sooner or later, perhaps after a stay in the hospital, I might make an announcement of that kind, but there is no risk of it: Thanks be to God, I enjoy good health, and as I have said, there are many projects to bring to fruition, God willing.”
And what changed after Benedict died:
Benedict died Dec. 31, 2022, at age of 95. There were not a few problems during those 10 years of cohabitation, with traditionalists and conservatives looking to Benedict as their nostalgic point of reference.
In his first interview with The Associated Press after the death, Francis again repeated that Benedict had opened up the possibility of future retired popes. He repeated that if he were to follow, he would live outside the Vatican in a home for retired priests in the diocese of Rome and be referred to as the “emeritus bishop of Rome” as opposed to “emeritus pope.”
Francis said Benedict’s decision to live in a converted monastery in the Vatican Gardens was a “good intermediate solution,” but that future retired popes might want to do things differently.
But a few weeks later, speaking to Congolese and South Sudanese priests, Francis changed tune. Freed from Benedict’s presence, Francis pointed out the risks that papal resignations become the norm. He repeated that he had written a letter of resignation, but made clear the papacy was for life.
“I did it in case I have some health problem that prevents me from exercising my ministry and I am not fully conscious in order to resign,” he said, according to the closed-door comments reported by the Jesuit journal La Civilta Cattolica.
“However, this doesn’t mean that resigning popes should become, let’s say, a ‘fashion,’ or a normal thing. Benedict had the courage to do it because he didn’t feel like going on because of his health. I for the moment do not have that on my agenda. I believe that the pope’s ministry is ad vitam (for life). I see no reason why it shouldn’t be so. The ministry of the great patriarchs is always for life. And historical tradition is important.”
“If, on the other hand, we listen to the gossip well, then we should change popes every six months!”


Russia claims advances in Kursk region, Zelensky demands sanctions

Russia claims advances in Kursk region, Zelensky demands sanctions
Updated 31 min 56 sec ago
Follow

Russia claims advances in Kursk region, Zelensky demands sanctions

Russia claims advances in Kursk region, Zelensky demands sanctions
  • Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Saturday called for more sanctions against Russia as overnight strikes killed at least 14 people
  • Ukraine’s troops in Kursk have seen their position worsen in recent weeks with Russia’s army encroaching

DOBROPILLIA, Ukraine: Russia on Saturday said its troops had retaken three villages seized by Ukraine in its Kursk border region in a fresh setback for Kyiv as the prospect of peace negotiations appeared to be increasing.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Saturday called for more sanctions against Russia as overnight strikes killed at least 14 people and wounded dozens more.
The war is at a critical juncture, days ahead of talks between US and Ukrainian negotiators aimed at securing a truce in the three-year-long war.
Washington has suspended crucial US military aid and access to satellite imagery and intelligence sharing after President Donald Trump and Zelensky had a public falling-out in the Oval Office last week.
Ukraine still controls some 400 square kilometers (150 square miles) in the Kursk region after launching a cross-border offensive last August and Zelensky sees this as a possible bargaining chip in peace talks.
But Ukraine’s troops in Kursk have seen their position worsen in recent weeks with Russia’s army encroaching.
Russia’s defense ministry on Saturday announced the recapture of three more villages: Viktorovka, Nikolayevka and Staraya Sorochina.
According to DeepState, an online military tracker linked to the Ukrainian army, the Russian move followed a “breach” in Ukrainian defense lines near the town of Sudzha, which is under Kyiv’s control.
Russia appears to have cut off the logistics route needed by Ukraine to supply its troops in the town.
The Ukrainian army has not commented on the latest claim, but Russia has already taken back more than two-thirds of its territory initially seized by Kyiv.
Peace negotiations remain a distant prospect with Kyiv and Moscow making starkly opposed demands. But Trump’s return to the White House has brought this prospect nearer.
The American president has radically shifted the US position, reaching out to Russian President Vladimir Putin while criticizing Zelensky.
Trump has said it may be “easier” to work with Moscow than Kyiv on efforts to end the three-year-long war.
Senior US and Ukrainian officials are set to meet for talks on the war in Jeddah on Tuesday. Zelensky will also visit on Monday for talks with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.
US envoy Steve Witkoff said he would speak to the Ukrainian negotiators about an “initial ceasefire” with Russia and a “framework” for a longer agreement.
Trump says he wants to end the war as soon as possible, but Ukraine fears being forced to make heavy territorial concessions to Moscow.
Kyiv’s troops are also struggling on the eastern front, although an AFP analysis of US-based Institute for the Study of War (ISW) data showed Moscow’s advance had slowed in February.
Trump on Friday threatened new sanctions and tariffs on Russia over its bombardment of Ukraine.
Zelensky also called for allies to “increase sanctions against Russia” after heavy overnight bombardment in the east and northeast.
A Russian assault hit the center of Dobropillia in the eastern Donetsk region late on Friday, killing 11 people and wounding 30, according to the emergency services.
Separately, three people were killed and seven others wounded in a drone attack early on Saturday in the town of Bogodukhiv, the military head of the eastern Kharkiv region, Oleg Synegubov, said.
Russia fired two missiles and 145 drones at Bogodukhiv, Ukraine’s air force said.
The latest air raids came after EU leaders, shaken by the prospect of US disengagement, agreed to boost the bloc’s defenses.
Putin “has no interest in peace,” the European Union’s foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said on Saturday, adding that “we must step up our military support.”
In Dobropillia, AFP saw charred residential buildings, flattened market stalls and evidence of cluster bomb damage.
Irina Kostenko, 59, spent the night cowering in her hallway with her husband. When she left the apartment building on Saturday, she saw a neighbor “lying dead on the ground, covered with a blanket.”
“It was shocking, I don’t have the words to describe it,” Kostenko told AFP.
Moscow’s defense ministry on Saturday said its air defense systems destroyed 31 Ukrainian drones over the past night.
A Ukrainian drone attack also targeted Russia’s Kirishi oil refinery and falling debris caused damage to a reservoir, the governor of the northwestern Leningrad region, Aleksandr Drozdenko, said.
A civilian was wounded by a drone attack in Belgorod district near the Ukraine border, local governor Vyacheslav Gladkov wrote on Telegram.


South Korea’s President Yoon free, trials continue after court quashes detention

South Korea’s President Yoon free, trials continue after court quashes detention
Updated 40 min 19 sec ago
Follow

South Korea’s President Yoon free, trials continue after court quashes detention

South Korea’s President Yoon free, trials continue after court quashes detention
  • The Seoul Central District Court canceled Yoon’s arrest warrant on Friday
  • “I would like to thank the Central District Court for their courage and determination in correcting the illegality,” Yoon said

SEOUL: South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol walked out of a detention center on Saturday after prosecutors decided not to appeal a court decision to cancel the impeached leader’s arrest warrant on insurrection charges.
Yoon, 64, remains suspended from his duties, and his criminal and impeachment trials continue over his short-lived imposition of martial law on December 3.
The Seoul Central District Court canceled Yoon’s arrest warrant on Friday, citing the timing of his indictment and questions about the legality of the investigation process.
“I would like to thank the Central District Court for their courage and determination in correcting the illegality,” Yoon said in a statement.
As he left the facility, a relaxed and smiling Yoon, in a dark suit with no necktie, stepped out of his car, waved, raised his fist and bowed to cheering supporters waving South Korean and US flags.
His lawyers said the court decision “confirmed that the president’s detainment was problematic in both procedural and substantive aspects,” calling the ruling the “beginning of a journey to restore rule of law.”
Prosecutors could not immediately be reached for comment.
The main opposition Democratic Party criticized the prosecutors’ decision for “throwing the country and people into crisis,” and urged the Constitutional Court to remove Yoon from office as soon as possible.
In his impeachment trial, the Constitutional Court is expected to decide in coming days whether to reinstate or remove Yoon.
On Saturday, some 55,000 Yoon supporters rallied in Seoul’s main districts, while 32,500 people demonstrated against him near the Constitutional Court, Yonhap news agency reported, citing unofficial police estimates.
The public, however remains largely anti-Yoon, with 60 percent of respondents saying he should be removed from office and 35 percent opposing removal, according to a Gallup Korea poll on Friday.
Before the prosecutors’ decision, hundreds of Yoon supporters also protested in front of the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office.
“I was very sorry that he couldn’t come out quickly, and it was a hard time for me to wait, but it was very much worth the wait,” said Lee Heoung-ok, a 62-year-old supporter who waited for Yoon’s release at the detention center.
Shim Ye-rin, 27, said: “I saw him walking out on his own feet and greeting his supporters. It was a little bit ridiculous to me because it seemed like something that couldn’t happen in a democratic society, something that was outside of common sense.”
Yoon, the first South Korean president to be arrested while in office, has been held at the Seoul Detention Center, located in the city of Uiwang, 22 km (14 miles) south of Seoul, since January 15.